Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

The accelerometer charge sensitivity test determines the exact electric charge output, expressed in picocoulombs per unit of acceleration, generated by a charge-mode piezoelectric accelerometer under controlled vibration excitation. Performed in accordance with standards such as ISO 16063-21 and the GB/T 20485 series, this calibration establishes the measurement traceability required for accurate vibration monitoring in aerospace, automotive, power generation, and structural testing. This article explains the technical principles, sample requirements, testing items, calibration methods, applications, and frequently asked questions related to accelerometer charge sensitivity testing.

Technical Overview

The accelerometer charge sensitivity test is a metrological calibration procedure that quantifies the electric charge generated by a piezoelectric accelerometer per unit of applied acceleration. Charge sensitivity (Sq) is defined as the ratio of the charge output (q) of the transducer to the mechanical acceleration input (a), and is expressed in picocoulombs per metre per second squared, written as pC/(m/s²), or in picocoulombs per g, written as pC/g.

Charge-mode accelerometers operate on the piezoelectric effect: when the seismic mass inside the sensor is accelerated, the piezoelectric element, typically quartz or a piezoceramic such as PZT, produces an electric charge that is directly proportional to the applied acceleration. Because the generated charge is extremely small, often between 1 pC and 100 pC per g, it must be transmitted through a low-noise coaxial cable and measured with a calibrated charge amplifier. Since the certified sensitivity value scales every vibration reading obtained with the sensor, periodic verification of charge sensitivity is essential for maintaining measurement accuracy and traceability.

Calibration is typically performed at a reference frequency of 160 Hz and a reference acceleration of 10 m/s² (approximately 1 g), in accordance with ISO 16063-1 and ISO 16063-21, or the equivalent Chinese national standards of the GB/T 20485 series. In China, statutory verification is commonly carried out according to JJG 233, the national metrological verification regulation for piezoelectric accelerometers. Calibration results are traceable to national measurement standards through an unbroken chain of comparisons, which is anchored by primary laser interferometric calibration performed per ISO 16063-11 at national metrology institutes and accredited third-party laboratories.

Testing Samples

Charge-Output Piezoelectric Accelerometers

Standard industrial and laboratory accelerometers with charge output, including shear-mode and compression-mode designs. This family covers high-sensitivity seismic-grade units used for low-level vibration measurement as well as low-sensitivity shock-grade units, with typical sensitivities ranging from below 1 pC/g to several hundred pC/g.

High-Temperature Accelerometers

Charge-mode accelerometers designed for elevated-temperature environments, often equipped with integral mineral-insulated cables and differential charge outputs. These sensors are calibrated at room temperature, and their temperature response can additionally be characterized in a thermal chamber when the application requires corrected sensitivity values at operating temperature.

Reference and Working Standard Accelerometers

Back-to-back reference standard accelerometers and working standards used as transfer references in calibration laboratories. These transducers require tighter uncertainty levels and shorter recalibration intervals, and they are periodically verified against primary calibration results.

Sample Preparation Requirements

  • Clean, flat mounting surface with adequate surface finish; undamaged mounting threads or holes.
  • Intact connector, clean contacts, and a low-noise charge cable free of kinks and contamination.
  • Verification of insulation resistance and transducer capacitance prior to dynamic testing.
  • Stabilization of the sensor in the laboratory environment, typically at 23 °C ± 5 °C, before measurement.

Testing Items

Depending on the purpose of the test, such as routine recalibration, acceptance inspection, or type evaluation, the following items may be included in an accelerometer charge sensitivity test program:

  • Charge sensitivity at reference conditions, typically 160 Hz and 10 m/s², which is the core calibration item.
  • Frequency response over the specified operating frequency range, with deviation limits, commonly within ±5%, defined by the manufacturer or the applied specification.
  • Amplitude linearity across the specified measurement range to confirm that sensitivity remains constant at different acceleration levels.
  • Transverse sensitivity ratio, tested in accordance with ISO 16063-31, with typical acceptance values below 5% for general-purpose sensors.
  • Mounted resonance frequency determination in accordance with ISO 16063-32 to define the usable upper frequency limit.
  • Transducer capacitance and insulation resistance as supporting electrical parameters.
  • Temperature response characterization, when the sensor is used across a wide temperature range.

For routine periodic calibration, the charge sensitivity at reference conditions, together with a frequency response check, is normally sufficient. For new product qualification or forensic investigations, the complete set of items is recommended.

Testing Methods

Comparison Calibration (Back-to-Back Method)

The most widely used method is secondary calibration by comparison, performed per ISO 16063-21 and GB/T 20485.21. A back-to-back reference standard accelerometer, whose sensitivity is known from a primary calibration, is mounted on the table of an electrodynamic vibration exciter, and the accelerometer under test is mounted directly on top of the reference standard so that both sensors experience identical motion. A sinusoidal excitation is applied at the reference frequency and reference acceleration. The output of the reference standard is measured through its calibrated measurement chain, while the charge output of the unit under test is converted to a proportional voltage by a charge amplifier with a precisely known gain expressed in mV/pC, and read by a precision digital voltmeter or data acquisition system. The charge sensitivity of the unit under test is then calculated as the amplified output voltage divided by the charge amplifier gain and by the acceleration indicated by the reference channel. The typical expanded measurement uncertainty of this method is 1% to 2% with a coverage factor of k = 2.

Primary Calibration by Laser Interferometry

For reference standard accelerometers and applications demanding the highest accuracy, primary vibration calibration by laser interferometry is performed per ISO 16063-11. The displacement amplitude of the vibrating surface is measured directly by optical means, from which the acceleration is derived without the use of a mechanical reference transducer. This method achieves expanded uncertainties at the level of approximately 0.5% or better and serves as the source of traceability for the entire calibration hierarchy.

Typical Test Procedure

  • Visual and mechanical inspection of the sensor, connector, and cable; measurement of insulation resistance and capacitance.
  • Mounting of the reference standard and the unit under test using stud mounting, beeswax, or adhesive, with the surface condition and tightening torque controlled.
  • Connection of the unit under test to a calibrated charge amplifier through a low-noise cable, with the cable anchored to prevent triboelectric noise.
  • Application of sinusoidal excitation at 160 Hz and 10 m/s², verifying that total harmonic distortion and cross-axis motion of the exciter remain within the limits specified by the standard.
  • Simultaneous acquisition of the reference and test channel signals with multiple averaging cycles to reduce random error.
  • Calculation of charge sensitivity, evaluation of the uncertainty budget, and comparison with the previous calibration certificate to identify sensitivity drift.
  • Frequency sweep and, if requested, linearity, transverse sensitivity, and resonance frequency measurements.

Measurement Conditions and Accuracy Considerations

The laboratory environment is normally maintained at 23 °C ± 5 °C with relative humidity below 75%, free from strong air currents, vibration background, and electromagnetic interference. Major influences on the result include mounting surface flatness and tightness, cable triboelectric noise, base strain, humidity-induced degradation of insulation resistance, charge amplifier gain error, and the distortion and transverse motion of the vibration exciter. Each of these contributions is evaluated and included in the uncertainty budget in accordance with the guidelines of ISO 16063-1, and testing is conducted by competent personnel in laboratories operating under ISO/IEC 17025 management systems.

Applications

Verified charge sensitivity data underpin reliable vibration measurement across many industries:

  • Machinery condition monitoring in power plants, petrochemical facilities, and steel mills, where accurate sensitivity ensures correct conversion between acceleration, velocity, and displacement for fault diagnosis.
  • Aerospace and defense programs, including modal testing, ground vibration testing, and qualification of equipment subjected to specified vibration environments.
  • Automotive NVH analysis and durability road-load testing, where charge accelerometers are preferred for high-temperature locations such as engines and exhaust systems.
  • Civil structural health monitoring of bridges, buildings, and dams, as well as geophysical and seismic observation networks.
  • Environmental and reliability testing laboratories that verify the sensors used to control vibration tests performed according to IEC 60068-2-6 and related specifications.
  • Accelerometer manufacturers for production quality control, and accredited third-party laboratories and national metrology institutes for calibration services.

FAQ

What units are used to express charge sensitivity?

Charge sensitivity is expressed in pC/(m/s²) or pC/g. Because 1 g equals 9.80665 m/s², the two units are converted by a simple factor. For example, a sensitivity of 10.2 pC/g corresponds to approximately 1.04 pC/(m/s²).

How does charge sensitivity differ from voltage sensitivity?

Charge sensitivity is an intrinsic property of the piezoelectric sensing element, while voltage sensitivity equals the generated charge divided by the total capacitance of the transducer and cabling. A charge amplifier reads the charge directly, which makes the measurement essentially independent of cable length and capacitance. Sensors with built-in electronics, such as IEPE types, are instead specified in mV/g and require different calibration arrangements.

At which frequency and acceleration level is the test performed?

The reference conditions most commonly specified by ISO 16063 and GB/T 20485 are 160 Hz and 10 m/s², which corresponds to approximately 1 g. Additional frequency points and acceleration levels can be selected to characterize frequency response and amplitude linearity over the intended operating range.

How often should an accelerometer be recalibrated?

A recalibration interval of 12 months is standard practice for most working sensors, while reference standard accelerometers are often recalibrated every 6 to 12 months. Immediate recalibration is recommended after a sensor has been dropped, mechanically shocked beyond its rated range, exposed to excessive temperature, or whenever measurement anomalies appear.

What measurement uncertainty can be achieved?

Comparison calibration per ISO 16063-21 typically achieves an expanded uncertainty of 1% to 2% (k = 2), while primary laser interferometric calibration per ISO 16063-11 reaches approximately 0.5% or better. The achievable uncertainty depends on the quality of the shaker system, the reference standard, the measurement electronics, and the mounting conditions.

Can high-temperature charge accelerometers be calibrated?

Yes. Their charge sensitivity is first calibrated at room temperature using the standard comparison method. When the application requires it, a temperature response test in a controlled thermal chamber provides sensitivity correction factors across the rated temperature range, ensuring accurate measurements in high-temperature installations.